some of my notes

Comment on Weekly Tip 2 by rajeshWednesday, September 21, 2011 12:34 AMsir,
your tips self explorable and thinkable.

some of my statments and experiences:::::::::::::

when we keep the head forward and down consciously, from the balance line of the body , what happens?
ans:
nothing happens.
1) since we know and conscious of, that the head is forward and down.
2) in the next movement , we have a chance of to keep the head to the balance line.since, we are
conscious.
3) PROBLEM STARTS , then only when we are not in consciousness and unconsciously keeping
the head forward and down or back and down, with undue tension.

when we kept the head forward and down unconsciously what happens?
ans:
1) the head is pulled by the gravitational force, since, itwas out of balance line
2) the torso,legs,hands moves to wrong directions to nutralise that pull
3) means, the head is compressing the spine.

whether really the head has the power of to compress the total body?
ans:
absoultely and 100 percent truth this is.
if the head shifts out of balance line with unconscious, the total body stresses.
what is a bad habit?
ans: my pardox idea is,
' IT IS A INFINITE LOOP OF UNCONSCIOUSNESS , WITH BAD DIRECTION'
i have to try my thoughts and ideas.
excuse me if any wrong ideas are there.
thank you.Comment on Weekly Tip 2 by rajeshTuesday, September 20, 2011 10:40 PMsir,
your tips are self thinkable.

how awareness begins from the back?
ans:
compared to front part of the body, back of the body has lot of muscle groups to experience.
is it not correct?
yes my statement is correct.
so, what leland val saying is absolutely 100% true.

WETHER ALEXANDER NOT EXPLAINED SOME THING, WHICH HE HAD EXPERIENCED?
ans : may be, who knows?
might been he did not had words to explain that experience.

CAN WE PARADOXICALLY THINK IF THE HEAD, NECK ARE AT THE BALANCE LINE OF THE BODY, THEN
THE HEAD IS SAID TO BE FORWARD AND UP?
ANS :
iam believing yes.
since, alexander not used the word ' BALANCE LINE' of the body, in his books rarely.
wether he though if he used the word 'balance line' it creates doing?
or BALANCE LINE of the body this word is not there at 100 years back?

''' iam paradoxically thinking that
HIS DIRECTIONS ARE MOVING THE BODY TOWARDS THE BALANCE LINE OF THE BODY, FOR KEEPING
THE BODY IN A GOOD MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE POSITION, WITH OUT DOING AND INHIBITING INSTINCT
STIMULUS'''

what is best mechanism available in the body for breathing?
ans:
1)thorax or thoracic cavity, with thoratic curve is the best mechanism available in the body for breathing.

how we can use thorax mechanism effectively for breathing?
ans:
1) by keeping the thoratic curve near the balance line of the body, then the thorax is said to be with good mechanical advantage position.
but how to keep that thoratic curve with good mechanical advantage position?
::: by keeping head, neck at the balance line of the body.
then the thoratic curve have a chance of lengthening and making good mechanical advantage position for breathing.
2)the lumbar,sitting bones,hips,legs,hands should be reaching and working with the balance line of the body for keeping the thorax in good mechanical advantage position.

I NOTICED , IAM BREATHING SHALLOW BREATHING, WHAT I HAVE TO DO?
ans:
since , iam believing
1)the mechanical advantage of the thorax disturbed, to nutralise this
2)keep the head,neck at the balance line,which is forward and up
3) keep the thoratic curve in the balance line
4)and check for other mechanisms like lumbar,legs,hands for best possible satisfactory physco phsical analysis.

I KEPT HEAD,NECK FORWARD AND DOWN?IAM FEELING NOTHING WRONG, WHAT IS THIS?
ans: this is debauched kinesthesia.
1) it wont effect immediatley
2)after one hour or two hours , the body gets tightens then only we come to know that some thing is wrong going in my body

HEAD FORWARD AND UP(BALANC), FORWARD AND DOWN, BACK AND DOWN SEEMS ME SAME?
ans: 1)this faulty sensory
2)but head forward and up is the best mechanical advantage position, which balances the total body.

(NOTE: ALL MY VIEWS IN THE COMMENT ARE PARADOX.
PLEASE EXCUSE IF ANY BAD DIRECTIONS,BAD IDEAS ARE THERE)

and direct me in good direction.

thank you.Comment on Weekly Tip 2 by Suzanne StewartSunday, September 18, 2011 11:47 AMThank you so much. I have never thought of this before. Using your mind to include you in your world gives you an insite into your self worth. At this point in my life-age 81-I'm groping my way. Can't wait to see what happens next. I'm sharing your work with my husband who is in a wheelchair. He just decided not to walk. Bless you.Comment on Leland Vall’s Alexander Technique Tip 74 by rajeshFriday, September 16, 2011 10:20 PMsir,
your tips and directions are self thinkable.

WAS ALEXANDER PROJECTING ONE CYCLE OF 4 DIRECTIONS, WITH IN FRACTION OF a SECOND?(MY ASSUMPTION)
ANS : i think and believing yes.
1)he was projecting one total cycle, with in a fraction of second and he was also
experiencing the ‘critical movement’ , for making a fresh decision in the dynamic activity.

2) SITTING TO RAISING FROM A CHAIR DYNAMIC DAILY ACTIVITY, IF IT TAKES ONE SECOND TO COMPLETE FOR SITTING POSITION TO RAISING POSITION FROM A CHAIR, THEN

::::::A second has a 1000 Milli seconds.to complete raising from a chair from sitting position, it takes approximately one second, this is not exact time but just assumption.
* at 100 Th Milli second he was completing the first direction many times.(STILL SITTING IN CHAIR)(STILL SITTING OR IN THE ACTIVITY)
* at 200 Th mill second he was completing the second direction,first direction many times(IN THE ACTIVITY STILL GOING)
* at 300 Th Milli second he was completing the third direction, second direction, first
direction many times .(IN THE ACTIVITY STILL GOING)
* 500 Th millisecond time ( IN THE ACTIVITY)
* 600 Th millisecond time (IN THE ACTIVITY)
******************** experiencing of critical movement*******************
* 700 Th millisecond time(IN THE ACTIVITY)
* 800 Th time(IN THE ACTIVITY)
* 900 Th projecting the all directions sequence.
* he is satisfying the end AT THE END OF THE SECOND OR 1000 Th millisecond finally.(ACTIVITY COMPLETED OR END)

( THIS ABOVE STATEMENT IS JUST MY PARADOXICAL ASSUMPTION,between 0 millisecond to 1000 th millisecond he makes the body very fluid, in 10 minute of activity there may be hundreds of these cycles paradoxically for satisfactory end)
IS ALEXANDER REALLY THAT MUCH QUICKLY TAKING THE DIRECTIONS BY DIRECTING?

please help me , whether my paradoxical assumption is wrong or right, and suggest me?
please excuse me , if any wrong directions or assumptions are there.

i have to try my paradoxical idea.no alternate for me.

thank you.Comment on Leland Vall’s Alexander Technique Tip 74 by rajeshFriday, September 16, 2011 9:43 PMsir,
your tips and directions are self thinkable.

WAS ALEXANDER PROJECTING ONE CYCLE OF 4 DIRECTIONS, WITH IN FRACTION OF a SECOND?
ANS : i think and believing yes.
1)he was projecting one total cycle, with in a fraction of second and he was also
experiencing the 'critical movement' , for making a fresh decision in the dynamic activity.
2)a second has a 1000 milli seconds
* at 100 th milli second he was completing the first direction many times.
* at 200 th milli second he was completing the second direction,first direction many times
* at 300 th milli second he was completing the third direction, second direction, first
direction .
* time
* time
******************** experiecing of critical movement*******************
* time
* time
* projecting the all directions sequence.
* he is satisfying the end finally.

( THIS ABOVE STATEMENT IS JUST MY PARADOXICAL ASSUMPTION)
IS ALEXANDER REALLY THAT MUCH QUICKLY TAKING THE DIRECTIONS BY DIRECTING?

please help me , wether my paradoxical assumption is wrong or right, and suggest me?

i have to try my paradoxical idea.no alternate for me.

thank you.Comment on Leland Vall’s Alexander Technique Tip 74 by rajeshThursday, September 15, 2011 1:59 PMsir,
your tips are self thinkable.

Where there is stimulus, there is movement
where there is movement, there is direction
where there is direction, there is choice of directing.

This is paradox idea, please direct me in this regard.

Thank you.Comment on Leland Vall’s Alexander Technique Tip 74 by rajeshThursday, September 15, 2011 3:00 AMsir,
your tips are self thinkable.

why mind is foolishly behaving?
why iam not able to believe the power of means where by?
why iam always sticking to one direction, and hoping for the best physophysical satisfaction?
why iam not able belive the alexander original statement of ,
IF THE MEANS YOU FOLLOW , THEN THE MEANS SECURE THE END.
why iam not able to believe the means TO LET THE BACK LENGTEHN AND WIDEN , THE NECK FREE AND THE
HEAD SHOULD BE FORWARD AND UP?
why iam sticking to neck and head forward and up? and leaving other directions?
why iam sticking to single direction?

i have to try.

thank you.Comment on Leland Vall’s Alexander Technique Tip 74 by rajeshTuesday, September 13, 2011 10:02 AMsir,
your tips are thinkable.

What is the first part in comment2? And 2nd part? And 3 rd part in alexandr view? Can any body help me by answering this question?

Ans@ my paradox answer is the first part is
''the higher stimulus part with associated bad habit and with habitual bad direction''

please help me by answering this question.

Thank you.Comment on Leland Vall’s Alexander Technique Tip 74 by rajeshTuesday, September 13, 2011 2:53 AMsir,
your tips are self exploratory.

IS ALEXANDER TECHNIQUE DIRECTIONS ARE SEQUENCE? AND WHY? ( copied from original alexander book).

ANS: alexander directions are sequential directions.




(1) that before attempting to " do " even the first

part of the new " means-whereby " which I had decided

to employ in order to gain my end (i.e., vocal use and reciting),

I must give the directions preparatory to the doing

of this first part very many times;

(2) that I must continue to give the directions preparatory

to the doing of the first part while I gave the directions

preparatory to the doing of the second part;

(3) that I must continue to give the directions

preparatory to the doing of the first and second parts

while I gave the directions preparatory to the doing of the

third part; and so on for the doing of the fourth and other

parts as required.

Lastly, I discovered that after I had become familiar with

the combined process of giving the directions for the new

" means-whereby " in their sequence and of employing the

various corresponding mechanisms in order to bring about the

new use, I must continue this process in my practice for a considerable

time before actually attempting to employ the new

" means-whereby " for the purpose of speaking.



MY INTENTION WAS REALLY NOT TO TEACH ANY BODY.

thank you.Comment on Leland Vall’s Alexander Technique Tip 74 by rajeshSunday, September 11, 2011 11:09 PMsir,
i believe, and i dont have that much experience on commenting tip 74.
since, i believe for thinking of and inhibiting the speaking, requires whole body in good
direction including head, neck.
but, i will sure try this idea within this one week of time, i will post my experiences.

my small experience::::::::

IS IT COMPULSARY TO SENSE THE MOVING OF PELVIS OR HIPS AT THE HIP JOINT FREELY ,WHEN RAISING AND SITTING IN CHAIR , WHILE STILL CONTINUING THE DIRECTION OF NECK FREE , HEAD FORWARD AND UP FOR BETTER SATISFACTORY OF THE PHYSCOPHYSICAL SELF?


ANS:
1)i think and iam believing yes.
2)in a dynamic activity of sitting, when the neck free and in lengthened state,
continuing the skull or head go forward and up, still continuing the spine moving from the hips prevents the compressing of the neck and head moving backwards and downwards.
3)iam believing the neck should be , and the skull should be free at the atlanto with forward and up rotation, and the hip joints should be free for to prevent the spine not to shorten.
::::::::PRIMARY CONTROL(one after the other and all to gether ,my paradoxical idea in
the dynamic activity of the sitting and raising from a chair)

the neck should be free (maintains its length and not forward or backward and down)
the skull or head freely rotates on the top of the spine and it is forward and up
the spine( cervical+lumbar+sacrum) lengthens, so that it can rotates freely at the hip joints releasing the knees forward, still continuing the neck free and head forward and up.

(note::all the above directions runs one after the other all to gether with sequence)

THIS IS MY PARADOXICAL IDEA OF PRIMARY CONTROL. I HAVE TO TRY AND THINK OF THIS IDEA.

THIS MAY BE GOOD FOR ME.

THANK YOU.